Radiometric dating answers com
This is to get the average, or, most accurate date possible, within the margin of error that you allow.Are there scientists out there that will swear up and down that their dates are completely accurate?Most geologists understand the dating techniques, and accept their limitations. The author gives a very good description of Carbon-14, except the flood part.He assumes the coal beds were all laid down during the Flood, but I have already disproved that theory .In his conclusion, he states "It (Carbon-14) does not give dates of millions of years." Correct, and there isn't a geologist out there who would claim Carbon-14 to establish a date of millions of years.
In fact, you would have to excavate it in a vacuum to be 100% sure, because once it is exposed to the atmosphere, it is exposed to more Carbon-14.
If you are in the middle of space, what is a "day." If you are eternal, what meaning does time have? Before we go on..thinking "context." We can't only rest on radiometric dating.
Keep considering the rock layers, which can't be laid down in a global flood.
If there are possible discrepancies, how can I accept these dates as reliable?
The young earth creationism believer thinks that all we are relying on is the radiometric techniques.I can look in my scientific journals and see apparent discrepancies in dating techniques.Some may be discrepancies…some may just need a bit further explanation.Job 12:8 says "speak to the earth, and it will teach thee." Secular and Christian scientists, outside of a religious framework, have examined God's creation, and it says, "I'm 13.7 billion years old." Nowhere in the Bible does it state that the days of creation are 24-hour days.